Seller Guide
The Transfer Disclosure Statement, the Seller Property Questionnaire, natural hazards, deaths, the as-is misconception, and the Los Angeles overlays that catch sellers out.
California asks a seller of residential property to do something unusual: to write down, in their own hand and under their own name, what is wrong with the house. Most jurisdictions rely on the buyer to investigate. California layers a statutory disclosure regime on top of that, and then adds a common-law duty to disclose material facts that the statutory forms do not reach. The result is a body of paperwork that sellers find tedious and lawyers find decisive, because the overwhelming majority of post-closing disputes in this state turn on what a seller knew and did not write down.
This guide explains the core documents and the reasoning behind them: the Transfer Disclosure Statement and the buyer's right to terminate after receiving it, the Seller Property Questionnaire and the broader duty it serves, the Natural Hazard Disclosure and the six specific zones it reports, Mello-Roos and assessment lien disclosures, and the narrow statutory rule on deaths in a home. It then addresses the persistent belief that selling in as-is condition removes the obligation, and finishes with the Los Angeles specifics: permit history and unpermitted space, preservation overlay status, city retrofit and report obligations, and defensible space documentation in fire hazard zones.
The organising principle is simple and, for most sellers, counterintuitive. Disclosure is protective. A defect that is disclosed, documented and priced into the deal is a closed subject, negotiated once, at the moment when the seller still has leverage and alternatives. The same defect, undisclosed, remains a live claim for years after closing, and the remedy available to a buyer is not limited to what the repair would have cost. Nothing here is legal advice, and the application of these rules to any specific property is a question for a California real estate attorney and for your own broker, who carries independent statutory duties alongside yours. Every statute cited is named so that you can check it.
The Transfer Disclosure Statement, required under Civil Code Section 1102 and following, is the central document. It applies to transfers of residential real property of one to four dwelling units, with a set of statutory exemptions for particular transfer types. The seller completes it, identifying the systems and features present, disclosing known defects and answering a series of specific questions about the property and about matters affecting it. It is a statement of what the seller knows. It is not a warranty, and it is not a substitute for the buyer's own inspections.
Timing matters and is often mishandled. Civil Code Section 1102.3 requires delivery as soon as practicable before transfer of title, or before execution of the contract in the case of a sale contract, option or ground lease coupled with an option. If the statement is delivered after the buyer has executed an offer, the buyer may terminate the offer by delivering written notice of termination to the seller or the seller's agent within three days after delivery in person, or five days after delivery by deposit in the mail or by electronic record. Late delivery therefore hands the buyer a fresh cancellation right, which is a strong reason to prepare the disclosure package before the property is marketed rather than after an offer arrives.
Your broker has a separate and independent obligation. Civil Code Section 2079 imposes on a broker a duty to a prospective buyer of residential property of one to four dwelling units to conduct a reasonably competent and diligent visual inspection of the property offered for sale and to disclose all facts materially affecting the value or desirability of the property that an investigation would reveal. That duty runs alongside yours, not instead of it, and the agent's inspection disclosure is a separate document. A seller who withholds something from their own agent is not reducing the disclosure; they are removing their agent's ability to help manage it.
The Seller Property Questionnaire is a California Association of Realtors form rather than a statutory one, and its function is to reach the material facts that the statutory Transfer Disclosure Statement does not specifically ask about. It covers matters such as prior repairs and alterations, insurance claims, disputes with neighbours, litigation affecting the property, pets, water intrusion, association matters, prior inspection reports and work done without permits. Sellers frequently treat it as an optional extra. In practice it is where the disputes live, because it asks the questions that a buyer would later say they would have wanted answered.
Behind both forms sits the common-law duty. California requires a seller to disclose facts materially affecting the value or desirability of the property that are known to the seller and not known to or readily observable by the buyer. That duty is not bounded by the questions printed on a form. If you know something significant about the house, its history, its systems or its surroundings, the fact that no box asked about it is not a defence. The test is materiality and knowledge, not whether the form anticipated the issue.
The practical technique used by careful sellers is to write more, not less, and to attach rather than summarise. Prior inspection reports, contractor invoices, permits, engineering letters, insurance claim records and correspondence with an association should be delivered as documents. Attaching a report you consider unfavourable is uncomfortable and it is also the single most effective protection available, because it converts a contested question of what the seller knew into a documented fact the buyer received. If you are unsure whether something is material, the right response is to ask your agent and, where the stakes justify it, a real estate attorney, rather than to decide alone.
The Natural Hazard Disclosure Statement, required under Civil Code Section 1103 and following, reports whether the property lies within any of six mapped hazard areas: a special flood hazard area designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, an area of potential flooding from dam failure under Government Code Section 8589.5, a high or very high fire hazard severity zone identified by the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection, a wildland area that may contain substantial forest fire risks under Public Resources Code Section 4125, an earthquake fault zone under Public Resources Code Section 2622, and a seismic hazard zone for landslide or liquefaction under Public Resources Code Section 2696.
It is a mapping disclosure, not an engineering opinion. It tells the buyer which government maps include the parcel, and nothing about how the house was built, how it has performed, or what a specific hazard would do to it. Civil Code Section 1103.2 states that a consultant's report delivered to satisfy the statutory exemption must always be accompanied by a completed and signed Natural Hazard Disclosure Statement, and that the representations are a disclosure between seller, agent and buyer only and are not to be used by any other party, including insurance companies, lenders or governmental agencies. Sellers should note that limitation, because buyers sometimes present the report to an insurer as though it settled something.
In Los Angeles the hazard map answers are rarely all negative. Hillside neighbourhoods carry fire and seismic designations, some carry landslide zones, and coastal and canyon parcels can carry flood designations that surprise their owners. A designation is not a defect and should not be treated as one, but it does have consequences for insurance availability and cost that a buyer will discover during their own underwriting. It is better for that to be a known feature of the transaction from the beginning than a discovery in week three of escrow.
Civil Code Section 1102.6b requires a seller to make a good faith effort to obtain a disclosure notice from the relevant local agency where the property is subject to a special tax under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act, an assessment installment under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, or a contractual assessment program, and to deliver that notice to the prospective buyer when the local agency makes it available. Once the notice has been delivered, the seller and agent have satisfied their informational responsibility as to that particular special tax or assessment.
The practical significance is that a property tax bill can carry obligations that have nothing to do with the ad valorem tax rate, and a buyer modelling carrying costs from an assessed value alone will get the wrong answer. Contractual assessment programs, including energy efficiency financing repaid through the tax roll, sit in this category and can also appear as a recorded lien on the preliminary title report. Sellers who financed solar, windows or seismic work through such a programme should identify it early, because whether it is paid off, assumed or negotiated is a term of the deal rather than an administrative detail.
The general lesson extends beyond the statute. Anything that attaches to the property and survives the sale belongs in the disclosure package: assessments, association obligations, recorded agreements, easements, encroachments, shared driveway, wall or septic arrangements, view or tree agreements reached with a neighbour, and any outstanding order or notice from a public agency. Order the preliminary title report at the outset and read it as a disclosure document rather than as an escrow formality. It will surface items the seller has genuinely forgotten, it will be read closely by the buyer and their lender, and an unexplained recorded document discovered late in escrow costs far more than one addressed before listing.
California has a specific statute here, and it is both narrower and more precise than most people assume. Civil Code Section 1710.2 provides that no cause of action arises against an owner, the owner's agent, or any agent of a transferee for failing to disclose the occurrence of an occupant's death upon the real property, or the manner of that death, where the death occurred more than three years prior to the date the transferee offers to purchase. The same section provides that there is no duty to disclose that an occupant of the property was living with human immunodeficiency virus or died from AIDS-related complications, and the Legislature framed the provision as occupying the field on those particular subjects.
The limitation on that protection is the part that matters. The statute expressly withholds immunity for an intentional misrepresentation made in response to a direct inquiry from a buyer or prospective buyer concerning deaths on the property. So the rule is not that the subject may be denied. A seller who is asked directly must not answer falsely, regardless of when the death occurred. The safe posture, and the one most California practitioners advise, is to answer direct questions honestly and to discuss with counsel whether a particular history should be volunteered.
It is also worth separating stigma from condition, because the two are governed differently. Where an event left a physical condition, a remediation history, a police or fire department record, an insurance claim, or repair work performed without permits, that is a condition of the property and is disclosable on ordinary principles regardless of the three-year rule. The statute addresses the fact of a death and the manner of it, and nothing more. It does not create a shelter for undisclosed structural damage, contamination, biohazard remediation, unpermitted repair work, or any other physical consequence that followed from the event and that a buyer would consider material.
The most durable myth in California residential sales is that an as-is sale relieves the seller of disclosure. It does not. Civil Code Section 1102.1 states in terms that delivery of a real estate transfer disclosure statement may not be waived in an as-is sale. What as-is actually means is that the seller is not agreeing to make repairs, and that the buyer takes the property in its present condition. It allocates the cost of known conditions. It does not licence concealment of them, and a purchase agreement provision cannot convert a nondisclosure into a permitted one.
Sellers resist disclosure because they fear it invites renegotiation. The economics point the other way. A disclosed condition is priced once, at the front of the transaction, when the seller still has leverage and alternatives. An undisclosed condition is priced twice: once through a post-inspection demand made when the seller's leverage is at its lowest, and potentially again as a claim after closing, where exposure is not limited to the cost of the repair and can include the buyer's costs of pursuing it. The asymmetry is the entire argument for over-disclosure.
The operational version of this is to build the disclosure package before listing rather than during escrow. Complete the statutory forms and the questionnaire carefully and in your own words, obtain your own inspections, gather permits and prior reports, order the preliminary title report, and deliver the whole package to prospective buyers early enough that offers are made with full knowledge of what is in it. Buyers who receive a complete file at the outset make cleaner offers and fewer late demands, because there is less left to discover. The seller who assembled it is negotiating from a documented position rather than defending an omission, and that difference tends to show up in the final number.
Permit history is the recurring Los Angeles issue. A converted garage, an enclosed patio, a basement finished into habitable rooms, an added bathroom, a deck, a pool enclosure or an accessory dwelling unit that was never permitted or never finalised is both a disclosure item and a valuation item. Sellers should obtain the permit record for the property and compare it against what physically exists, and disclose the discrepancy plainly rather than describing unpermitted rooms in marketing copy and hoping the question is not asked. The Department of Building and Safety also requires, under Section 96.300 of the Municipal Code, that a seller of residential property in the city apply for a Report of Residential Property Records, the 9A report, which will itself surface the recorded position.
Two overlays sit on top of that. If the property is in a Historic Preservation Overlay Zone, exterior alterations are subject to review under the applicable preservation plan, and prior work done without the required approvals is a disclosable fact with a practical consequence for the buyer's plans. Separately, the city's point-of-sale ordinances impose obligations that are the seller's to satisfy, including water conservation fixtures under Municipal Code Section 122.03, seismic or excess flow gas shut-off valves under Section 94.1217, smoke detectors under Section 91.8603 and carbon monoxide detectors under Section 91.420.6.2.3, with additional requirements for buildings of three or more units. Any outstanding order or notice to comply from a city department should be disclosed and, where possible, resolved before listing.
Fire hazard zones carry their own documentation. Civil Code Section 1102.19 requires a seller of property in a high or very high fire hazard severity zone to provide the buyer with documentation of compliance with defensible space requirements, and where that documentation is not available at closing, the buyer and seller may agree in writing that the buyer will obtain it within one year of closing. Fire agency guidance also describes an additional disclosure obligation, effective from July 2025, covering available fire-hardening retrofits, retrofits completed during ownership, and known vulnerabilities such as gaps in eaves, single-pane windows or a roof that is not Class A rated. Confirm the current requirement and the inspecting agency for your specific address with the fire authority having jurisdiction.
Disclosure statutes, local ordinances and standard forms change, and their application depends on the specific property and transaction; confirm current requirements with the relevant agency and obtain advice from your own California real estate attorney and broker before relying on anything here.
Work With Ben
Every property is its own set of facts. Tell Ben what you are looking at and he will tell you what to check first.
Start the ConversationBen will reach out shortly to set up your tour.